Comments by Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS)

Regarding NRC Proposed Rule, “Licensing Requirements for Microreactors and Other

Reactors With Comparable Risk Profiles”

Docket ID NRC-2025-0379; 91 Fed. Reg. 23,628 (May 1, 2026)

Submitted June 15, 2026 via Federal eRulemaking Portal

Nuclear Energy Information Service is a Chicago-based safe-energy advocacy, nuclear power watchdog environmental organization.  NEIS opposes the continued deployment of nuclear power in an energy landscape that has amply demonstrated the presence and effectiveness of cheaper, more quickly deployable, and superiorly cost-effective means of providing electric power.

NEIS hereby adopts, supports and incorporates by reference the comments submitted by the Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS; dated June 15, 2026) and those of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP, dated Feb. 2026), including DEEP’s request for a 45-day extension of the public comment period, unreasonably denied without justification on May 1, 2026.

In addition, NEIS provides the following comments.  Taken together, NEIS supports the contention made by other commenters that this Proposed Rulemaking should be terminated.

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Validity of promulgating directives is challengeable:

NRC lists as its reasons for issuing this Proposed Rulemaking clauses from the ADVANCE Act, and the Presidential E.O. 14154 (90 FR 8353; January 29, 2025), titled, “Unleashing American Energy,” with an objective of unleashing “America’s affordable and reliable energy and natural resources;” as well as E.O 14300.

While the directives from the ADVANCE Act may be defensible from a regulatory, engineering and technological standpoint, those of the E.O.s are not.

For example, micro reactors and related small modular nuclear reactors (SMNRs) are not yet shown to be either “affordable (or) reliable,” largely because they do not yet exist in significant enough numbers to support this contention.  Even preliminary SMNR costs have escalated well beyond initial optimistic marketing values (e.g., NuScale/UAMPS debacle of 2023-24).  The President’s declaration of a “National Energy Emergency” has yet to be verified in any credible, reality-based manner, casting serous doubt on its validity as a basis for the changes proposed in the E.Os.

  • Numerous references to “self-regulation”:

Sections that call for “licensee-defined design and quality assurance criteria,” significant flexibility in safety classification, and reduced reliance on deterministic safety principles such as the single-failure criterion are tantamount to de facto industry self-regulation.

It would be wise to recall the dangerous history of this abdication of regulatory responsibility and accountability and its effects on the public and the environment:

  • The determination that lack of FAA regulatory oversight allowing Boeing to largely self-supervise its own design and operational procedures was responsible for two fatal crashes;
  • Acknowledgement that railroad lobbyists opposing vital train safety regulation led to the East Palestine train derailment and subsequent chemical fire;
  • Recalling that, “The … Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident was the result of collusion between the government, the regulators and Tepco, and the lack of governance by said parties,” according to the National Diet of Japan official report, Executive summary of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, June 2012, p. 16.

The broad “… proposed rule [that] would provide flexible licensing pathways with streamlined requirements… to enable a broad spectrum of deployment models,” is likely to result in virtually no meaningful regulation at all, given the current large numbers of proposed designs, and the NRC’s and Administration’s goals of rapid deployment.

  • Significant systemic safety concerns not sufficiently addressed:

Emphasis on speed (actually haste) and genericization is an unacceptable combination that contains the elements of potential disaster.  Among these are:

  • “Microreactors and Other Reactors with Comparable Risk Profiles” exist in a world vastly different from that which ushered in the Age of Large-Scale Reactors. While the design goal of a safer reactor is highly desirable, not only does it remain a goal until actually demonstrated, it should not be the presumption on which to discard the “defense in depth” philosophy that has been the industry-proclaimed hallmark of nuclear power operations to date.  To make that egregious error of logic is a techno-hubris that places the public and environment at great risk.  Some examples of this dangerous and flawed thinking include:
  • Designs that will no longer require some form of containment, both for stationary and mobile designs
  • Termination of emergency planning zones and procedures
  • Reduced operational personnel, with the expectation they will operate multiple units; or worse, “autonomous function” operations (particularly if it is based on A/I technology of speculative performance capability for these functions).
  • Insufficiently considered safety elements:
  • Multiple designs, no matter how generic, will be placed in varied operational conditions and for varied purposes which may have impacts on operation that differ from site to site, as well as among designs;
  • Widespread dissemination of micro- or SMNRs will be operated under diverse environmental conditions, such as local geography, climate and weather, and now the increased frequency and intensity of adverse weather phenomenon – all of which must be factored into safety considerations;
  • The “Age of the Drone” and its effects on safety and security have been amply demonstrated in Ukraine and the Middle East. We submit that even undergrounding of reactors would have been of little safety value in Mariupol or Gaza.  Release of radioactive contents of micro- and SMNRs through use of drone warheads cannot be ruled out.  This is of particular concern with designs that will be running on HALEU fuel, or are sodium or helium cooled.  The increased radiologic inventory from a HALEU release, and the vulnerability and subsequent chemical hazards from a loss of the proposed coolants create unique radiologic and chemical hazards that must be designed against.  This vulnerability may be of even greater concern during the transportation of micro- and SMNR reactors to their designated final destinations.
  • This point was made abundantly clear by national security expert, Brig. Gen Chris King (retired) during a nuclear power debate held on Pacifica Radio in 2023. King’s response to the notion of numerous, mobile micro-reactors distributed all over the country was revealing:

“How do I protect and ensure the safety of those [SMNRs] from an external threat? And the more [reactors] you got, the harder it is to protect…If there’s a thousand of those scattered around, and someone’s moving them around at their own choosing, that’s a significant threat…

“That’s very, very risky from a force protection, from a national security standpoint.  It would be very difficult to achieve national security goals in that domain.”

     –Brig. General Wendell Chris King, retired, Dean Emeritus, U.S. Army Commander, General Staff College, Aug. 15, 2023, “Climate Hour”, Pacifica Radio–

4.)  Once again – the radioactive waste:

While much attention has been given to promoting these new reactor designs, we do not see comparable attention paid to the additional amounts of radioactive waste they will add to the >100,000 tons of high-level radioactive waste (HLRW) already accumulated in the U.S – with no disposal occurring to date.

Worse, the proposed use of HALEU, as well as the multiplicity of designs creates new and previously non-existent radwaste problems, both terms of the change in core inventories, and the creation of new and non-traditional forms in which the waste will occur.  All of this complicates the final disposal plans for HLRW.

For the above reasons, and particularly given the denial of an extended comment period, NEIS urges the NRC to terminate this Proposed Rulemaking process.

We thank you for your consideration.

David A. Kraft, Director

Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS)

3411 W. Diversey, Ste. 13

Chicago, IL  60647

(773)342-7650

neis@neis.org

 

 

Remember – you’re moving forward when jumping off a cliff, too.
Feb. 18, 2026

The curtain has finally and unequivocally been ripped back: Read more

CHERNOBYL YOUTUBE LINKS
39th anniversary of the disaster

1.) THE WORLD’S FIRST NUCLEAR DISASTER: CHALK RIVER (13:01)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WcBIzRzswg&pp=ygUxVEhFIFdPUkxE4oCZUyBGSVJTVCBOVUNMRUFSIERJU0FTVEVSOiBDSEFMSyBSSVZFUg%3D%3D

2.) CHERNOBYL MINERS: THE UNTOLD STORY OF THE TUNNEL UNDER CHERNOBYL (13:20)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5B62y4yK9Y&pp=ygVAQ0hFUk5PQllMIE1JTkVSUzogVEhFIFVOVE9MRCBTVE9SWSBPRiBUSEUgVFVOTkVMIFVOREVSIENIRVJOT0JZTA%3D%3D

3.) THE FIRST DEMON CORE ACCIDENT (19:02)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdiH2GrV7ic&pp=ygUfVEhFIEZJUlNUIERFTU9OIENPUkUgQUNDSURFTlQgIA%3D%3D

4.) CHERNOBYL DOME: IT FAILED SO BADLY (10:17)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CZ6ph7XHKk&pp=ygUpNC4pCUNIRVJOT0JZTCBET01FOiAgSVQgRkFJTEVEIFNPIEJBRExZICA%3D

5.) RBMK: THE SOVIET REACTOR THAT WAS DOOMED (13:26)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OlB3JmMLgk&pp=ygUvNS4pCVJCTUs6ICBUSEUgU09WSUVUIFJFQUNUT1IgVEhBVCBXQVMgRE9PTUVEICA%3D

6.) THE MYSTERY OF THE ELEPHANT’S FOOT (14:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBg_lfR8YcM&pp=ygUoNi4pCVRIRSBNWVNURVJZIE9GIFRIRSBFTEVQSEFOVOKAmVMgRk9PVA%3D%3D

7.) CAUSES OF THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER: TRUTH AND FICTION – FALSE NARRATIVE 1 (23:06)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqys4Ij3M54&pp=ygU6Ny4pCUNBVVNFUyBPRiBUSEUgQ0hFUk5PQllMIERJU0FTVEVSOiAgVFJVVEggQU5EIEZJQ1RJT04gIA%3D%3D

8.) CAUSES OF THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER: TRUTH AND FICTION – FALSE NARRATIVE 2 (31:48)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsjrFyOQcF8&pp=ygU6Ny4pCUNBVVNFUyBPRiBUSEUgQ0hFUk5PQllMIERJU0FTVEVSOiAgVFJVVEggQU5EIEZJQ1RJT04gIA%3D%3D

9.) WEIRD PINE THAT BECAME CHERNOBYL’S DARK EMBLEM | CHORNOBYL UNCHARTED EP 18 (9:14)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b84eRR8JTrY&pp=ygVQOS4pCVdFSVJEIFBJTkUgVEhBVCBCRUNBTUUgQ0hFUk5PQllM4oCZUyBEQVJLIEVNQkxFTSB8IENIT1JOT0JZTCBVTkNIQVJURUQgRVAgMTg%3D

10.) THE BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL (94 mins.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97klTG8Lp5M&pp=ygUXVGhlIEJhdHRsZSBvZiBDaGVybm9ieWw%3D

11.) CHERNOBYL HEART: THE DARK SIDE OF NUCLEAR POWER (40 mins.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjnjbvh6Cys&pp=ygUPQ2hlcm5vYnlsIEhlYXJ0

 

 

 

Greetings All —

On this the 39th anniversary of the nuclear power disaster in Chornobyl, Ukraine, we share this message and attached statement from a Belarusian colleague.

As the Illinois legislature and others around the U.S. continue to be mesmerized by the beckoning calls of the nuclear sirens, continue to ignore the inherent hazards of nuclear power, and refuse to remediate the already-caused damage and exposure effects, this message serves as a warning.  As the saying goes, history may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme sometimes.  With 11 operating reactors and over 11,000 tons of high-level radioactive wastes within its borders, probability is not on Illinois’ side.

Be well, for a non-nuclear future,

–Dave Kraft, Director, NEIS–

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Tanya Novikova
Date: Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [decomm_wkg] 39 years since Chernobyl radioactive disaster, the nexus with uranium mining

Here is the Statement by the Belarusian non-profits in exile on Chernobyl Day

On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:14 PM Tanya Novikova <novikova@gmail.com>

Dear Friends,

Today is a dark day in modern history. Exactly 39 years ago, the Chernobyl nuclear disaster struck communities across vast parts of the European continent. It did not stop there, though. Chernobyl’s radioactive iodine-131 circled the globe and was even detected in Antarctica.

Human technological civilization — proud of its spaceships, scientific advancements, and unprecedented international cooperation — turned out to be helpless in the face of a radiation catastrophe. Humanity proved capable of producing artificial radionuclides that remain toxic for hundreds, thousands, and even millions of years, but powerless to contain them once they are released from a reactor during an accident. Nor can it fully protect people from the harm that “peaceful atoms” inflict across generations.

The consequences of Chernobyl continue to persist. Large territories in Russia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany, Switzerland, and even Sweden remain contaminated and will do so for many decades. For Belarus and Ukraine, the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone will remain dangerous virtually forever on a human timescale.

In Ukraine and Belarus, the health effects of the disaster still impact the third generation of residents. This is evidenced by both official statistics — such as a multiple-fold increase in thyroid cancer among children reported by the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Belarus — and independent research from Yuri Bandazhevsky’s group (Belarus-Ukraine), among others.

However, the world has not fully learned the lessons of Chernobyl. Many countries today continue to promote nuclear energy as a “new,” “green,” and “climate-friendly” solution — claims that are far from reality. A number of countries, including the United States, not only extend the service life of morally and physically obsolete nuclear power plants, but also plan to restart reactors that had already been shut down, even while relaxing safety control procedures.

Nevertheless, the course of history shows that the global energy industry is increasingly shifting toward a different path — namely, toward renewable, affordable, and truly sustainable energy technologies.

On this day, we must not only honor the victims of Chernobyl but also raise our voices in defense of renewable energy. It is up to us today to ensure that there is never another Chernobyl!

I invite you to read a statement from non-profit organizations of Belarus in exile issued on the 39th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, along with a leaflet containing key facts from the full nuclear fuel cycle. It demonstrates that nuclear energy begins with genocide and environmental disasters — and ends with even greater catastrophe.

Thank you for sharing, discussing, and supporting!

Yours,

Tatyana Novikova

antinuclear activist,

MS in Sustainability

 

Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster

On April 26, we mark 39 years since the largest man-made disaster of the 20th century
— the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. This tragedy cast a dark shadow
over Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, and many other European countries.

Belarus became the country with the most contaminated territory (23%) and, as a result,
the gravest long-term consequences. For our country, Chernobyl is not just a
technological disaster — it is a national wound: poisoned land, water, and air; the
nation’s compromised health; sick children — all of this has become part of Belarusian
reality. This catastrophe will remain with us for hundreds of thousands of years — until
all toxic radionuclides decay.

On this dark day, Belarusians around the world hold mourning marches known as the
“Chernobyl Way” to honor the memory of the disaster’s victims. For many years, civil
society in Minsk carried this event forward, defying the constraints of a totalitarian
regime.

The totalitarian USSR enabled the conditions that made the Chernobyl catastrophe
possible. The dictatorship of Lukashenka continues to exacerbate its consequences by:

• silencing facts and downplaying risks,
• putting contaminated land back into economic use,
• depriving Chernobyl victims and affected people of social benefits,
• repressing scientists, activists, and organizations speaking the truth about
Chernobyl, many of whom have been imprisoned or are currently behind bars,
• promoting dangerous Russian nuclear technologies in Belarus, at the doorstep of
neighboring countries: both nuclear weapons and the Astravets NPP, which had
been erected with violations of European safety standards and national
legislation, in a non-transparent and undemocratic way,
• discussing the construction of a second NPP while the first is underutilized for
half of its operational time and the energy system has no need for its electricity.
Nuclear disasters do not occur only in authoritarian countries — democracies are not
immune either. We learned this from the example of Fukushima. Moreover, even
democratic nations can exhibit authoritarian tendencies, as we have seen in the past
decade.

Democratic countries with nuclear plants may become targets of nuclear terrorism and
military aggression, as demonstrated by Russia’s attacks on Ukraine and on Chernobyl
and Zaporizhzhya NPP in 2022 and 2025.

At the same time, the international democratic community and the IAEA have proven
incapable of effectively addressing the problems of nuclear blackmail, military attacks
on nuclear facilities, or dealing with the consequences of nuclear disasters.
Sadly, the lessons of Chernobyl remain unlearned. Countries are not abandoning
nuclear energy — instead, they present it as climate-friendly and conditionally “green,”
using calculations that ignore technological realities and associated risks, as well as the
full nuclear fuel cycle. The issue of spent nuclear fuel, which remains toxic for up to a
million years (according to the IAEA), remains unresolved.

The world’s fleet of operating nuclear power plants is aging. Yet instead of transitioning
to cheaper, more accessible energy generation technologies — including renewables —
many countries are extending the life of existing plants and attempting to restart shut-
down reactors, creating significant safety risks.

Nuclear materials continue to spread globally, and the threat of nuclear conflict is
growing.

On this day, we address the authorities of Belarus with the following demands:
• Immediately shut down and decommission the Astravets NPP, which is unsafe
and unnecessary.
• Return Belarus to its nuclear-free and neutral status.
• Remove Chernobyl-contaminated areas from economic use.
• Restore social support for people affected by the consequences of the Chernobyl
disaster.
• Resume scientific research on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident and
reestablish cooperation with the global scientific community for this purpose.
• Release environmental activists and all other political prisoners, including
participants in the anti-nuclear movement.
• Support Belarus’ transition to a sustainable energy system based primarily on
renewable and decentralized sources.
We call on the international community to:
• Consider the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus as a violation of the
principles of collective security.
• Strip nuclear energy from green agendas (such as ESG frameworks and climate
finance mechanisms).
• Prioritize conventional deterrence means and strategies over nuclear weapons.
• Ban the trade of uranium and nuclear technologies with aggressor states (such
as the Russian Federation).
• Prevent the militarization of nuclear facilities by strengthening international legal
frameworks and undertaking coordinated action within the global community.
• Honor the memory of the victims of the Chernobyl disaster and continue
supporting liquidators and those affected.
• Express solidarity with the people of Ukraine, who faced nuclear threats during
acts of military aggression.

We also appeal to the member states of the IAEA with a proposal to reconsider the
organization’s core priorities and put human safety above profits and the ambitions of
individual states. We call on the IAEA to take the risks associated with nuclear
technology use and proliferation seriously. To that end, we urge the IAEA to revise its
guarantees, protocols, and mechanisms in such a way that the organization, which is
promoting a so-called “nuclear renaissance,” bears legal and financial responsibility for
the consequences of nuclear accidents and nuclear terrorism.

The resolution was adopted by NGO Ecohome, Green Network, Belarusian National
Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, Dapamoga, Solidarity
Movement “Together,” Narodnaya Hramada, the United Civic Party, Our House, and the
RE:Belarus Association of Belarusian Political Prisoners, Association of Belarusian
Political Prisoners “Da Voli,” and supported by the United Transitional Cabinet of
Belarus, the Office of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.

 

 

UPDATE:  4/9/22

The IAEA:  “You had one job, only one job.  And…”

CNN has made it to Chernobyl before the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA. The IAEA has expressed only an intense sense of urgency regarding getting into the Chernobyl site and the exclusion zone and yet they are not there but CNN is. The IAEA lost all ability to track the nuclear fuel on the site to prevent nuclear proliferation at Chernobyl when Russia seized the site. They have not been there to check the radiation levels at the facility or within the Red Forest where the Russian soldiers dug trenches and likely contaminated themselves. The IAEA has not been able to ensure the safety and security of the nuclear site or provide the safeguards needed to protect nuclear materials. The IAEA has not been able to confirm the radiation exposure to Russian soldiers or to what level of exposure they received. These are all duties of the IAEA. How can nuclear power operate safely in a world that goes to war when IAEA members go rogue and do not follow the guideline or treaties regarding nuclear power facilities as Russia has done in Ukraine?
The European Union should be helping Ukraine move to a 100% renewable energy supply so they can shutdown their nuclear power plants.  Certainly the Ukrainian people do not want another Chernobyl on their land, impacting the Ukrainian people, Europe or the world.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/08/europe/chernobyl-russian-withdrawal-intl-cmd/index.html

 

UPDATE:  4/8/22

From Moscow to Kansas

This certainly makes you wonder what cyberattacks are being tried now and how many years from now we will hear about them.

https://www.flatlandkc.org/news-issues/inside-story-kansas-cyber-spies-nuclear-power-and-the-ukraine-war/?utm_medium=email&fbclid=IwAR3y1A3hi1WttZchie2f_cP-5JBN_7v6sPMX_AZwnnmUAqQyQmeEP6hphFY

 

UPDATE:  4/4/22

Russian troop’s exposure to radiation.

It has been reported that Russian troops have been exposed to radiation in the Chernobyl zone. We have been searching for more detailed information as to the level of illness the Russian troops have. How sick they are would give some indication as to the level of exposure they received. Could the troops have received an ‘acute’ dose from digging in the Red Forest area which has the highest levels of radiation in the exclusion zone or did they have exposure to some other radioactive materials at the actual Chernobyl facility? We hope answers will be forthcoming from Russia and Belarus, who reports say are treating the soldiers. Both Russia and Belarus are members of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, and if they decide not to cooperate with the IAEA on conveying accurate information it will just be yet another example of how the IAEA has no real power or authority over IAEA members when they go rogue and put everyone at risk of another nuclear disaster.

The global nuclear industry has been telling the world that nuclear reactors could be operated safely, that nuclear proliferation could be prevented and that humans could be stewards over nuclear waste for generations into the future. What we have found now, in just 36 years since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, is that a country that had agreed to operate within the global nuclear industry rules can on any given day decide to disregard safety and security of nuclear reactors and their stored waste. They can send soldiers into nuclear contamination zones who are ignorant to the special nuclear agreements their country entered into previously and who are uninformed to the harm they put themselves and others in through their actions. We are not capable of being good stewards of the aftermath of nuclear disasters or nuclear waste now and we cannot expect generations 200 years from now to remember what hazards Chernobyl or Fukushima are. The nuclear industry and the IAEA have cloaked themselves in a veneer of safety & security and non-proliferation safeguards that have been exposed as ineffective and easily transgressed.

https://thebulletin.org/2022/04/russian-forces-leave-chernobyl-un-watchdog-offers-ukraine-more-help/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=MondayNewsletter04042022&utm_content=NuclearRisk_RussianForcesLeaveChernobyl_04012022

 

 

With the nuclear reactor crisis emerging in Ukraine as a backdrop, a bill – HB 5589 — has been introduced in the Illinois Legislature that would remove a decades-old moratorium on constructing new nuclear reactors in Illinois. Read more

2022 has been quite a year so far.  No sooner do we begin recovering from the gut-punching reminder of “Don’t Look Up!” that we have a potentially civilization ending Climate Code Red to contend with, and fast, when along comes – Russia. Read more

       
 

UKRAINE NUCLEAR UPDATE —  3/6/2022, 9 pm (CST)

Gail Snyder, NEIS Board President

Ukraine has 4 sites with a total of 15 operational reactors, Chernobyl is also a nuclear site of concern because of the nuclear waste stored on site as well as the contaminated accident site. Read more

Ukraine Nuclear update: 10 pm, Thursday, March 3, 2022

Like many of you we are watching the situation in Ukraine with the nuclear power plants unfold as if our worst nightmare is coming true. 

By Gail Snyder, NEIS Board President

CHERNOBYL

The Chernobyl nuclear facility is now occupied by the Russians and did experience a large spike in radiation that returned to its previous normal level. It is not understood what caused the spike in radiation and it is our understanding that new radiation levels have not been updated. It has been speculated that the army moving about the area disturbed the contaminated soil causing the radiation to spike. We have also heard that such a high spike in radiation would have to have been caused by something else, possibly opening the sarcophagus that covers the damaged reactor but we do not have any confirmation that anything like that occurred and as far as we know that is just a theory of what could have caused the spike.

ZAPORIZHZHYA
The brave Ukrainians that blocked the Russians from accessing the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant were overtaken by the Russians. As you are probably already aware there are currently multiple types of artillery fire around the nuclear power plant and a structure adjacent to or within the nuclear site is on fire. Such a facility has many buildings. We do not know what is on fire. CNN this evening had the spokesperson for the facility, Android Tuz, on, he said, “many buildings are on fire” but “not fire on the reactor”. He also said firefighters cannot enter the facility to put the fire out.

There are six reactors at this site, one is in operation but all six are loaded with fuel in the reactors according to the spokesperson.  This is the largest nuclear reactor site in Europe

The spokesperson said a nuclear accident could occur at any time if the Russians start firing weapons again. It seems to have stopped for the moment.

There is a great amount of spent nuclear fuel on the site. Which is of equal or greater concern that the reactors themselves depending on how the spent reactor fuel is stored.

Under the current situation there are many ways that significant damage can cause a nuclear accident to either the fuel in the reactors or to the spent fuel. A meltdown of any fuel could cause a significant release of radiation into the environment impacting those nearest the facility and anyone downwind.

Here is a link to the latest IAEA update but it is already outdated as it does not talk about the fire.

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-9-iaea-director-general-statement-on-the-situation-in-ukraine

Russia Attacks Ukraine – LIVE BREAKING NEWS COVERAGE (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant, War Updates)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HVRapGiNoY

 

 

“Public Official A”  — the former Illinois Speaker of the House Michael Madigan — has (finally) been indicted under the charges of racketeering, relating to the ComEd lobbying scandal of 2020.  It ultimately led to Madigan leaving his post in the Illinois legislature after serving as House Speaker for 36 years.

Illustrated by George Eckart

The scandal resulted in a guilty plea by ComEd and a $200 million fine; and the indictment of three of ComEd/Exelon’s top executives: Exelon Utilities CEO and President Anne Prammagiore, former ComEd lobbyist John Hooker, and consultant Jay Doherty.   ComEd’s vice president of governmental and external affairs Fidel Marquez resigned, and later plead guilty to a charge of bribery.  Trial dates are expected in 2022.  Throughout initial FBI investigations relating to these individuals, references were made of “Public Official A”, which by description could only have been Madigan.

Madigan becomes the second state legislature House speaker to be indicted by the FBI.  Former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder was also indicted relating to a $60 million bribery scheme to support a nuclear utility in Ohio.  Madigan continues to proclaim his innocence.

It is amazing how nuclear power utilities and federal indictments relating to bribery and more are being paired up in recent years.  In addition to the two indictments above, a utility executive overseeing the construction of SCANA’s VC Summer nuclear plant in South Carolina also plead guilty in the $11 billion fraud case in 2020.

Nuclear power seems to go hand in hand with political corruption.

 

Ex-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan is indicted on federal racketeering charges

By Dan MihalopoulosDave McKinneyTony Arnold —  WBEZ-FM